PROPER NAME: Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Adsorbed
VACCINE INGREDIENTS (not in order of quantity; see package insert for quantities): Formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, sodium chloride, polysorbate 80 (Tween 80)
Substances used to create and grow the vaccine, which may or may not appear in the final product: formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, Fenton medium (containing bovine extract), modified Lathammedium (derived from bovine casein), modified Stainer-Scholte liquid medium, aluminum hydroxide
LORI MATHESON vs MICHAEL SCHMITT is a case between a wife and a husband, and the conflict between them on the issue of vaccines for the welfare of their daughter.
The father, Michael Schmitt, is of the belief that their daughter, Faith, should receive all the vaccines that she has missed and to continue receiving the CDC-recommended vaccines on time.
Dr. Plotkin agrees with the father, that Faith should receive all the vaccines that she has missed and to continue receiving all of the CDC-recommended vaccines on time.
This deposition of Stanley Plotkin, M.D. delved into topics such as money/funding aspect of vaccines and the conflicts of interests that exist; vaccine ingredients; safety of vaccines; VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System); anti-vaccinationists or anti-vaxxers; the lack of vaccine safety studies.
One of Dr. Stanley Plotkin’s advice at the ACIP meeting in 2017 is to conduct more vaccine safety studies to prove the anti-vaccinationists wrong.
Mr. Siri (Co-counsel for the Plaintiff) asked Dr. Plotkin this question, “Shouldn’t vaccine safety studies be done for the sake of making vaccines safer, not for the purpose and with the pre-determined objective of proving so-called anti-vaccinationists wrong?